Mycotoxins Increase The Risk Of Cancer

Mycotoxins Increase The Risk Of Cancer

Mycotoxins Increase The Risk Of Cancer

Mycotoxins have been shown to obstruct apoptosis or programmed cell death.

By: Dr. Nathan Goodyear 

Mycotoxins are toxins are just as their name implies: myco = fungus and toxin = toxin. These toxins originate from a fungus that commonly grows in the food supply and in water damaged areas. Mycotoxins will increase the chance of cancer developing in the human body.

Mycotoxins have been shown to be [39] [40]:

  • Carcinogenic
  • Mutagenic
  • Teratogenic
  • Immunotoxic
  • Hepatoxic
  • Hemorrhagic
  • Nephrotic
  • Neurotoxic
  • Dermatoxic
  • Endocrine (hormone) disruptors

Mycotoxins can be defined as “natural products produced by fungi that evoke a toxic response when introduced in low concentration to higher vertebrates and other animals by a natural route“ [41]. Mycotoxins are some of the most well-known toxins to contaminate the food supply including but not limited to aflatoxin, ochratoxin, fumonisins, patulin, zearalenone (ZEA), and trichothecenes from the fungus Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium.

In addition, mycotoxins are found in water-damaged walls, wallpaper in homes, buildings… Not all mycotoxins are inherently toxic as the antibiotic penicillin is a mycotoxin. The question lies in where is the toxicity directed?

Mycotoxins Are Affecting People Globally

Mycotoxins are a world-wide problem affecting an approximate 25% [42] of the world’s food supply. Mycotoxins are most commonly found in the grain and cereal foods i.e. wheat, barley, nuts, corn, rice… Even the coffee in your morning cup of joe is a potential source—so sad.

These food items are commonly stored at room temperature in containers on the counter in the kitchen or in foods stored in the pantry or on the store shelf which is in part the origin of the risk. Don’t forget about animal products, such as beef, chicken, milk, eggs… that are raised on mycotoxin contaminated rich foods are also a potential exposure source.

Zearalenone is one of the most common mycotoxins that the U.S. food supply is at risk for. Animal and human studies have shown that zearalenone does accumulate in the body [43] [44]. This is huge because if these low exposures to 1,000s of potentially toxic chemicals are quickly cleared, then the risk and concern is limited; however, if these toxins bioaccumulate, then the low exposures to 1,000s of potentially toxic chemicals are, in fact, accumulating ticking time bombs.

Zearalenone is an endocrine disruptor; specifically, zearalenone mimics estrogen [45]. Zearalenone readily binds to the estrogen receptors (ER). Zearalenone stimulates an estrogenic signal through the specific binding to the ER-alpha receptors, not ER-beta [46].

This preferential ER-alpha affinity shifts the ER-alpha/ER-beta receptor balance to an ER-alpha dominance. This affinity of zearalenone for ER-alpha and ER-alpha dominance has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer [47], esophageal [48], colorectal cancer [49] and prostate cancer [50].  Specifically, this mycotoxin has been shown to inhibit apoptosis (programmed cell death) stimulate proliferation, promote cancer cell invasion and metastatic spread of cancer cells 45 [51] [52].

Most interesting is that this powerful estrogenic signal, peak proliferation, and invasion occurred at the lowest levels of exposure. This has enormous implication as most people are not exposed to acute, high toxic loads of mycotoxins, or any toxin for that matter, but instead are exposed to small, regular, indolent exposures to hundreds of toxins every day.

Again, evidence shows that toxins like zearalenone can bioaccumulate in the environment and the human body. It is this regular exposure, bioaccumulation and synergistic toxic effects of these multiple toxins that change the environment in our body to increase the risk of cancer.

The Effects of Mycotoxins and EMF’s

 As in all things, disease such as cancer is never the result of 1 item. It is the collective, synergistic effects that come together to affect disease risk. This is no more evident than in the growing volume of research that points to the synergistic effect of EMFs and mycotoxins.  EMFs are all around us in our day-to-day activities and our home is the biggest offender.  Common sources of EMFs include:

  • Cellphones
  • Wi-Fi
  • Wi-Fi dependent devices
  • TVs
  • Radios
  • Power lines
  • Microwave ovens
  • Computers

Our home environment can no longer be simply defined by the walls and roof of our house/apartment/Condo… but these home sources of Wi-Fi exposure even travel with us in our personal cellphones, car Wi-Fi… In fact, with the 4G and the coming 5G wave, EMFs are essentially becoming another element in our atmosphere home: Oxygen—check, CO2–check, EMFs—check.

Yet, we really don’t know what the long-term impact will be. The same mistakes are repeated time and time again. The new definition of our home environment must now include the immediate environment of our body wherever it goes.

 EMFs have their own set of carcinogenic risk issues, such as leukemia [53].  The International Agency for Research on Cancer labeled EMFs as potentially carcinogenic in 2011. Research also shows, that in addition to isolated EMF exposure risk, EMFs can actually stimulate fungal growth [54] [55].

This post is not about EMFs specifically, but about their synergistic activity with fungi which can have significant implications in the increase in mycotoxin production and mycotoxin release. Whatever the mycotoxin source exposure is (food, water-damaged houses, vaping pens…), add EMF exposure, which is all around us, and the mycotoxin production, mycotoxin exposure and resultant risk i.e. estrogenic, carcinogenic risk, will increase.

It is the Consistent Exposure to Mycotoxins on a Daily Basis That Presents a Threat To Our Health

 When it comes to potential environmental toxins, in this case, mycotoxins, everybody is looking for the 1 hit phenomenon or the 1 giant bomb that definitively results in disease. That is a pie in the sky view and won’t be found except in very rare cases of exposure.

In fact, it is a basic misunderstanding of what and how toxicity can occur. In this day of 30-second commercials, sound bites, and attention, if the cause and effects are instantaneous, then they don’t exist.

This lack of patience has even permeated science. The reality is that environmental toxins can also work via what I like to call the rain of 1000 bullets. This mechanism is the regular, often unrecognized, smaller spray of hits of accumulative toxic effects will cause disease given adequate time.

It is like a shotgun versus a bomb. Odds are much better that you will survive the acute spray of a gunshot from the shotgun, compared to the direct hit by a bomb, but eventually, that spray of gunshots will do its damage and get the same job done given time.

These toxins were never approved based on long-term studies that detailed their long-term risk to the general public; except in the case of the long-term exposure tests ongoing of which we are the unwilling test subjects without our approval. Time will tell the final numbers that will be written in some future scientific publication and our unknowing participation will be a mere afterthought.

My purpose here is not to create fear, but enhance knowledge, because knowledge is power. Knowledge is the power to act. Knowledge is the power to make a difference.

39 Steyn PS. Mycotoxins, general view, chemistry, and structure. Toxicol Lett. Dec 1995;82–83: 843–851.

40 Wallace Hayes A. Mycotoxins: A review of biological effects and their role in human diseases. Clinical Toxicology.1983;17(1):45–83.

41 Bennett J.W. Mycotoxins, mycotoxicoses, mycotoxicology and mycopathologia. Mycopathologia. 1987;100:3–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00769561.

42 Alshannaq A, Yu JH. Occurrence, Toxicity, and Analysis of Major Mycotoxins in Food. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):632. Published 2017 Jun 13. doi:10.3390/ijerph14060632.

43 Bennett JW, Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(3):497–516. doi:10.1128/CMR.16.3.497-516.2003.

44 Brera C., Debegnach F., De S.B., Di I.S., Gregori E., Neuhold S., Valitutti F. Exposure assessment to mycotoxins in gluten-free diet for celiac patients. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014;69:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.03.030.

45 Hueza IM, Raspantini PC, Raspantini LE, Latorre AO, Górniak SL. Zearalenone, an estrogenic mycotoxin, is an immunotoxic compound. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(3):1080–1095. Published 2014 Mar 13. doi:10.3390/toxins6031080.

46 Kowalska K, Habrowska-Górczyńska DE, Urbanek KA, Domińska K, Piastowska-Ciesielska AW. Estrogen Receptor α Is Crucial in Zearalenone-Induced Invasion and Migration of Prostate Cancer Cells. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(3):98. Published 2018 Feb 28. doi:10.3390/toxins10030098.

47 Pluciennik E. The role of WWOX tumor suppressor gene in the regulation of EMT process via regulation of CDH1-ZEB1-VIM expression in endometrial cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2015;46:2639–2648. doi:10.3892/ijo.2015.2964.

48 Pitt J.I. Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Br. Med. Bull. 2000;56:184–192. doi: 10.1258/0007142001902888.

49 Kwon O, Soung NK, Thimmegowda NR, et al. Patulin induces colorectal cancer cells apoptosis through EGR-1 dependent ATF3 up-regulation. Cell Signal. 2011;24(4):943–950. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.12.017.

50 Kowalska K., Habrowska-Gorczynska D.E., Dominska K., Piastowska-Ciesielska A.W. The dose-dependent effect of zearalenone on mitochondrial metabolism, plasma membrane permeabilization and cell cycle in human prostate cancer cell lines. Chemosphere. 2017;180:455–466. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.027.

51 Liu Q., Wang Y., Gu J., Yuan Y., Liu X., Zheng W., Huang Q., Liu Z., Bian J. Zearalenone inhibits testosterone biosynthesis in mouse Leydig cells via the crosstalk of estrogen receptor signaling and orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 expression. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2014;28:647–656. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.01.013.

52 Ayed-Boussema I., Bouaziz C., Rjiba K., Valenti K., Laporte F., Bacha H., Hassen W. The mycotoxin Zearalenone induces apoptosis in human hepatocytes (HepG2) via p53-dependent mitochondrial signaling pathway. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2008;22:1671–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.06.016.

53 Calvente I., Fernandez M. F., Villalba J., Olea N., Nuñez M. I. (2010). Exposure to electromagnetic fields (non-ionizing radiation) and its relationship with childhood leukemia: a systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 3062–3069.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.039

54 Voichuk SI, Podgorskii VS, Gromozova EN. Effect of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation on physiological features of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain UCM Y-517. Mikrobiol Z. 2004 May-Jun;66(3):51-7.

55 Hadjiloucas S, Chahal MS, Bowen JW. Preliminary results on the non-thermal effects of 200-350 GHz radiation on the growth rate of S. cerevisiae cells in microcolonies. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Nov 7;47(21):3831-9.